Trace integrity gives data agents a better reliability target than answer accuracy

Data agents can produce the right answer for the wrong reason, and that is a serious problem in business systems. If the reasoning trace is invalid, a benchmark score may hide a tool that cannot be trusted on unfamiliar data.

The trace-integrity idea is useful because it shifts evaluation from final output to process quality. In structured-data work, teams need to know whether the agent selected the right table, applied the right transformation, and preserved the logic needed to audit the result.

This matters for any company putting agents near dashboards, finance workflows, or compliance reports. Pagish will watch whether trace-based evaluation becomes part of production agent monitoring rather than staying in papers.